22/02/2012

London week ahead: Ken in Boris country

Posted by MereNews On May - 31 - 2011 ADD COMMENTS


Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson
Livingstone and Johnson at a hustings in 2008. Photo: Carl Court/PA

As this post goes live I’m checking my route by bus and train from near the heart of Hackney to the very core of Bromley, where later this morning I’ll encounter a man named Livingstone. Will he be feeling lost in an electoral wilderness? Ken, of course, has been a big figure in London politics for years. Yet Greater London’s biggest borough is resistant to his charms.

Why? Socially, it’s deeply suburban. Politically, it’s hugely Tory. Psychologically, it’s part of Kent. At the last mayoral election, Bromley preferred Boris Johnson by more than three votes to one. There’s no way Ken will turn that round. But if he can close the massive margin by just a few percent, it will spell trouble for the man who hoofed him out of City Hall in 2008 – such a swing replicated across town would do for him. A bigger Labour vote is out there. I’ll be reporting on Ken’s attempt to woo it.

Also this week: a look at the Mayor’s London 2012 sporting legacy programme; a closer examination of the Mayor’s New Bus for London; and a report on the Mayor’s performance at Thursday’s annual State of London debate at the Methodist Central Hall. What a lucky Mayor he is to be getting so much attention. And now it’s time to catch that Number 48.

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/davehillblog/2011/may/31/ken-livingstone-to-visit-tory-bromley

Asylum seekers barred from university

Posted by MereNews On May - 31 - 2011 ADD COMMENTS

Daniel was 14 when he arrived alone in the UK from Eritrea with just a few words of English. Ten years on, now a British citizen, he has a 2.1 from South Bank University in sports science, a well-paid job as a business developer for a management consultancy firm and has published a short story. While studying, he represented his university in table tennis and was a sports ambassador doing outreach work in local schools and running summer camps. In time, he wants to study for a master’s in something related to occupational psychology, and possibly go on to do a PhD .

“I want to be able to do what a typical person wants to do – which is to make a success of my life,” he says.

Had he been considering entering higher education this year, however, things would have been different. When he applied for university his application for asylum had still not been decided, but he was treated as a home student, eligible to pay home fees, for which he received a loan that he is now repaying.

Since a rule change in February, young people in this position, who have not been granted asylum but have been given discretionary leave to remain in the UK because it is not considered safe for them to return to their home countries, will be treated as overseas students, forced to pay higher overseas fees and with no access to grants or loans. As most of these young people came to the UK as lone children, with no money, and have been in local authority care, this locks them out of higher education altogether as they have no way of paying for their education.

Last year, 2,700 decisions were made on asylum applications from children aged 17 or under with no family to care for them in the UK, and of these, 1,935 were given discretionary leave to remain. Once children reach 17 and a half, they are allowed to stay, under their existing legal status, until a final decision is made on whether or not to grant them asylum, but because of a backlog of cases this can take years.

Kamena Dorling, manager of the Migrant Children’s Project at the Children’s Legal Centre, a charity that provides legal advice and representation to children and their carers, says: “Until these students are granted indefinite leave to remain, which may not be until they have been in the UK for over six years, they are cast into limbo at a crucial time in their lives.”

She says the centre has been overwhelmed by calls from social workers concerned about the effects of the rule change.

Alison East, a solicitor working for the Migrant Children’s Project, says: “Local authorities would normally be providing some on-going support of the sort that parents provide, but they cannot possibly meet the huge cost abyss that would open up if those young people cannot access student finance. This means they would fall out of education.”

She says support from other sources is also getting harder to find as higher tuition fee charges mean many charities that previously supported migrant children through university have started supporting home students instead. Then, while some individual universities may agree to provide funding or charge home fees, “you have to be stellar for universities to go the extra mile, especially this year because of what’s going on with the fees”.

One charity that does support some of these students is the Helena Kennedy Foundation, which provides bursaries, mentoring and support to disadvantaged students from further and adult education.

Wes Streeting, chief executive of the foundation, calls the changes “deeply regressive”.

“Ministers are expected to talk tough on immigration, and removing support for people who have discretionary leave to remain is part of that process,” he says. “But they need to look clearly at the sorts of students being affected by this. We want to make sure that people who come to the UK having survived very difficult circumstances are given access to education because that is often how they can do what the British public wants them to do, which is turn their lives around and make a contribution to the country that took them in.”

A spokesman for the Department forBusiness, Innovation and Skills says: “This change brings clarity to the system for those awarded leave to remain in the UK. It has been necessary in reviewing eligibility to ensure that limited financial resources are used effectively.”

But Streeting says the changes represent just one aspect of the difficulty young people seeking sanctuary in the UK have in going on to university.

While February’s rule change has particularly affected those who came to the UK unaccompanied, young people who arrived with their parents, but who apply to university before their parents’ immigration status is resolved, have always been treated as overseas students, even if they have been living in the UK for many years. This has long made higher education unaffordable for them. Also struggling are those who receive settled status too late to meet the three years eligibility criteria for home fees.

The foundation is now trying to get every higher education institution in the UK to offer at least one place for students seeking sanctuary, to waive tuition fees until their status is resolved and to offer training and mentoring support.

Its project, named Project Article 26 after an article in the Declaration of Human Rights that states that everyone has the right to education, has just received more than £40,000 funding from The Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fund, which it hopes will enable it to work with more universities to offer a package of support for these students.

James Lee, employment and training policy adviser at the Refugee Council, says this kind of help is badly needed.

“A young person will be encouraged to go on to university because they will be doing well at A-levels or the equivalent, and will be considered a home student at school, but when they apply to university they are slotted into an international student category from then on,” he says. “We think that’s unfair.”

He argues that it clashes with the government’s encouragement of high-level skills and penalises students who have often had to overcome traumatic experiences in order to achieve.

“These are often people who are particularly dedicated students,” he says. “Clearly if you arrive into a new educational system you have to work really hard both with language and academically.”

Daniel, who is still too worried about the stigma of having been an asylum seeker to use his real name, says people often do not realise how tough and emotionally taxing the process of seeking asylum is. “The worst thing about it is the uncertainty,” he says. “If you are unsure about what’s going to happen tomorrow, you are always on edge.”

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/may/31/asylum-seekers-overseas-students-fees

Efforts to tackle a major fire at Britain’s top secret nuclear weapons research site were plagued by poor communication, faulty fire hydrants, safety breaches and repeated confusion, according to an internal fire service report seen by the Guardian.

The official inquiry into the blaze last August at the Aldermaston Atomic Weapons Establishment (Awe) by the Royal Berkshire fire and rescue service contains strong criticism of the nuclear plant’s firefighting performance. There were “numerous problems” with the way the emergency was tackled, the report said. Aldermaston’s on-duty emergency controller was “overwhelmed by the demands of the incident and unable to effectively provide the information required”.

The fire started just after 9pm on 3 August when a solvent used in making explosives, methyl ethyl ketone, burst into flames. It burned for nearly nine hours overnight in a building within Aldermaston’s explosives technology facility and it took 16 fire appliances and 68 firefighters to put it out.

The government’s Health and Safety Executive is investigating whether to take legal action against Aldermaston. The results of the site’s inquiry into the incident are due to be published in the next few weeks.

Berkshire fire service’s “incident debrief” has been released in response to a request under freedom of information law. It said fire controllers discovered explosives were involved when they overheard a message in the background while they were on the phone.

Initial communications with Aldermaston were “limited”, the report said. Communications with Ministry of Defence police were at times “poor”, causing delays of more than an hour in some fire crews accessing the site.

Firefighters discovered that Aldermaston’s hydrants, which are meant to be a vital part of the site’s protection against fire, were so inefficient they had to bring in a special high-volume pump from London. The report blamed “a mistake with the opening and closing of sluice valves by a maintenance contractor”.

There were “breaches of safety measures”, including a premature attempt to reduce a safety cordon, a failure to distribute enough radiation badges causing delays, and fire and ambulance crews being left without security escorts.

The report pointed out that there were “numerous difficulties” with the agencies involved because the fire occurred at night and Aldermaston had strict security procedures. Access to the site was sometimes “slow”, fire crews had to be escorted, and hourly co-ordination meetings could include up to 40 people.

Peter Burt of the Nuclear Information Service in Reading, which obtained the fire service report, accused the site’s private sector managers, Awe, of downplaying the seriousness of the fire. It was described by the chief executive at the time, Robin McGill, as “a relatively small fire” to which the response had been “swift and effective”.

Burt pointed out that the fire service had mobilised a major response, which had been “complicated by the inadequate numbers of staff on site, over-zealous security, and Awe’s failure to maintain fire hydrant systems”. He said: “This report shows clearly that the brave firefighters who attended the blaze were let down by failures and shortcomings in Awe’s own safety arrangements.”

Awe insisted, however, that it took “prompt action” to deal with the fire according to standard procedures agreed with safety regulators and the emergency services. “We are committed to learning all available lessons from the incident,” said a spokesman.”The company commissioned an independently led investigation into the cause of the fire and we expect to report the findings to the Awe local liaison committee within the next few weeks as well as making them publicly available.”

A spokesman for the Health and Safety Executive said: “The HSE investigation into the incident at Awe in August 2010 is still ongoing and any decision on possible enforcement action is yet to be made.”

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/may/31/firefighters-aldermaston-nuclear-plant

Community railways are on the right track

Posted by MereNews On May - 31 - 2011 ADD COMMENTS

Community rail partnerships have transformed many of Britain’s local railways, and not just rural branch lines transporting tourists through some of our most scenic countryside. The partnerships cover around 60 lines, some of them urban routes in major cities where community rail is playing a role in urban regeneration. They bring together train operators, Network Rail, local authorities and more than 100 “station friends” groups and community groups that promote lines which were threatened with closure.

Many of the lines have experienced double-digit growth, thanks to imaginative promotion and community involvement, backed up by modest investment. Stations have experienced a new lease of life through community adoption, including a social enterprise which runs the booking office of a formerly unstaffed rural station.

Railways minister Theresa Villiers has praised the “ideas, innovation and enthusiasm” of community rail partnerships. And their services could be in more demand than ever, following last month’s government-commissioned report into rail industry costs by Sir Roy McNulty. He called for £1bn in costs to be stripped out of the industry and, while not recommending line closures, he floated the idea of phasing out ticket offices in small stations.

But as local authorities face hard decisions over budgets, some of these partnerships have already had their funding reduced and train operators are unable to make up the shortfall.

The Severnside Community Rail Partnership covers local routes in the Bristol area, including the branch to Avonmouth and Severn Beach. It runs through some of the most deprived parts of the south-west. The partnership is working to make stations more friendly and welcoming and to reduce crime, vandalism and antisocial behaviour.

“Better stations, with community involvement, encourage more people to use the train,” says Keith Walton, the partnership’s chair.

Stapleton Road station, on the Severn Beach line has been transformed through community involvement and boasts a mural celebrating the communities served by the station. Alongside the station is Roots, a community-run garden centre, located on formerly derelict railway land. The partnership worked with Network Rail to clear up the area and it is now a flourishing example of social enterprise.

At other stations along the line school students have created artwork which has transformed the appearance of what were once run-down, depressing eyesores. The partnership has also worked with the Probation Service in using offenders to help with environmental projects. The local “community payback” team has cleared decades of accumulated debris at stations prior to community groups moving in to plant the areas with shrubs and flowers.

Devon and Cornwall has a network of rural branch lines, most of which British Rail chairman Dr Richard Beeching wanted to shut in the 1960s in his controversial report on the reshaping of Britain’s railways, popularly known as the Beeching Axe.

Today they are thriving, thanks to the work of the Devon and Cornwall Rail Partnership. Based at the University of Plymouth, it brings together the two county councils, train operator First Great Western, and some unusual partners.

“We have developed a really successful partnership with the university students’ union,” says Rebecca Catterall, the partnership’s development officer. “Groups of students regularly go out to local stations and do a range of gardening, environmental and art work. They find it’s a great way to see the local area, meet new people and make a positive contribution.”

Funding is proving a problem with the Penistone Line Partnership, which runs trains from Huddersfield to Sheffield and is one of Britain’s first community rail partnerships, set up in 1993. It is best known for its live music and real ale trains, though it also works with local schools and Huddersfield’s black and minority ethnic communities.

It can only afford a two-days a week contract for the partnership officer, Rowena Chantler. Partnership chair, Neil Bentley, whose day job is driving trains for Northern Rail, says: “We have achieved a lot with volunteers, but having a paid worker makes a massive difference and helps to pull in more volunteers.” The partnership generates some income through bar sales on the music trains and selling literature about the line, including walks guides.

Hard work

Many stations now have “friends” groups that look after gardens and create artwork. The most innovative example is Gobowen in Shropshire. The station was unstaffed for many years until a local teacher, the late David Lloyd, had the idea of using his pupils to run a booking office as an educational project.

Things have moved on since then and Lloyd founded Severn-Dee Travel as a not-for-profit company, which runs the booking office. Use of the station has nearly doubled in the last five years and Severn Dee is a successful business. Sheila Dee, the community rail officer for the line and a director of the company, says that part of the growth is down to having staff at the station. “People from Oswestry and surrounding villages use the station knowing they can get good information and journey advice.”

The station staff can handle European travel, group bookings and specialise in schools travel – a much wider portfolio than a normal station booking office. Severn Dee has stimulated other local businesses. Later this summer a cafe will open on the station and one of the old railway buildings is already used as a GP surgery.

“Gobowen offers a way forward for other stations which are either unstaffed or facing booking office cuts,” says Dee. “But potential station businesses need to be prepared for a lot of hard work!”

Other partnerships are looking at ways of generating revenue through trading. The Settle-Carlisle Railway Development Company runs a flourishing station cafe at Skipton and provides an on-train trolley service along the scenic route.

Despite looming local authority cuts, Neil Buxton, general manager of the Association of Community Rail Partnerships (ACoRP), says he is “optimistic” about the future. “A small number of councils have withdrawn their support. But the contribution our members make to regeneration and social inclusion is being recognised, as well as the transport benefits.”

The signs are that most community rail partnerships will survive the austerity drive, though some with less capacity. Dr Beeching wouldn’t be pleased, but many local communities will be.

Paul Salveson set up the Association of Community Rail Partnerships and is a consultant on rail issues.

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/may/31/community-railway-lines-thriving-despite-cuts

When it comes to blogging MediaCityUK, I’m the first to admit to being something of a Johnny-come-lately. Michael Tabner, a 25-year-old full time web designer at Manual Link Building based in Altrincham, has already been at it for more than three years.


michaeltabner
Michael Tabner

He’s established a loyal following with his unofficial MediaCity dedicated blog attracting between 3 and 4,000 unique visitors a month and almost 5,000 Twitter followers. I caught up with him to find out more.

Q: When did you start the blog and why?
A: I started the blog in March 2008. I was working down the road from Salford Quays at the time and was following the news of Peel forming this bid for BBC North. As it became obvious that Salford was going to win the bid and this ‘media city’ was going to happen I thought there would be a need for a dedicated news site, amongst other things.

I registered a few domains and posted some simple articles and left it sit for a while. After around six months the site was pulling regular traffic, and it became obvious to me there were many people like myself who were interested in the project and wanted regular updates. From there it’s just been a case of regularly covering stories or updates I found most interesting, and the site and twitter/facebook accounts have ballooned from there.

Q: Who is the blog for?
A: The blog is for anybody who is interested in MediaCity. most of our traffic comes from Manchester and London, and I know from a lot of emails I’ve got that it’s become popular amongst BBC staff making the move or thinking about making the move. Around Manchester there are plenty of people interested in what’s going on, mainly people interested in employment opportunities.

Q: Why do you do it – what’s it for?
A: I do it because I’m personally interested in the development of the project, and in seeing how successful (or not) the whole thing becomes. As staff move into media city and other business take space I hope the focus will shift from the debates about staff moving or costs to programmes being made, exciting collaborations and events etc. 

I remember the first MD of media city describing it as the new ‘Silicon Valley‘ – and as such I thought there would be a need for a media city techcrunch.com equivalent to cover businesses based there, or even a Valleywag. (I think Silicon Valley is a pretty ambitious target and MediaCity isn’t really comparable, but you get the idea!)
Keep up with his MediaCity blog here.

Recent headlines from MediaCityUK

*The BBC’s employment plans and practices are currently coming under some scrutiny. On Thursday Guardian columnist and former Panorama editor and ITV Carlton production director Steve Hewlett will be in Manchester to proffer some of his controversial opinions on the BBC’s move to its new base, reports HowDo. The pro manchester’s annual lecture is at MOSI’s new Revolution Gallery on 2 June.

Meanwhile the Salford Star is pointing up the disparity between the money being paid out to the consultant in charge of finding work at MediaCityUK for people from ‘deprived’ areas compared to the money paid to the Salford youngsters for ‘ambassador’ roles. It writes that consultant Chris Marsh gets paid £46,800 for 12 days work a month on a six month contract, local young people are offered six month jobs at the BBC for £3.64 or £4.92 an hour.
The newsite says: “This story was brought to the Salford Star by a mum who lives in a ‘deprived’ area of Salford, disgusted that her daughter was asked to work for such rates while so much money was being paid to consultants, and BBC staff who can keep their London weighting while working in Salford.”

* The University of Salford has announced a new partnership focusing on research and innovation with leading digital marketing agency Fast Web Media.The partnership will also provide opportunities for Salford students to take up internships and short-term placements and to gain experience working with Fast Web Media experts. Stuart Wells, Director of Management Development Programmes for Salford Business School, said: “Search and social media marketing is one of the fastest growing areas in the whole digital marketing arena and this is a fantastic opportunity to formalise the already great relationship we have with Fast Web Media.”

* The man in charge of Studios at MediaCityUK has been talking about the stereotypes he’s encountered about moving north. Speaking at last week’s HowDo awards Andy Waters took to the stage to praise his newly-adopted region.
“Before I came, a lot of people talked about stereotypes about what you lot are like. How friendly you all are, how people will come and chat to you on the tram, or invite you in for a cup of tea. But what they also said is just how passionate you all are about this region and about this industry, and that is very evident in this room.”

*The BBC announces that Helen Bullough has been appointed as Head of CBBC Production with responsibility for all in house production for CBBC in MediaCityUK. She’ll lead a team of more than 200 staff, creating shows such as Blue Peter, Newsround, Tracy Beaker Returns, Legend Of Dick And Dom and Serious Explorers.

* The official MediaCity blog announced that four new companies have taken office space at the Greenhouse development at Media City in Salford Quays. Libra Television, digital business development advisor Peachy, Armstrong Legal and Kelly’s Eye Animation are the latest tenants to join Dreamscope Productions.

* Liverpool-based Splinter has been celebrating the contract to design and build the BBC North website: “It’s a big strategic move for the BBC and we were chuffed when we won the pitch to design and build the new BBC North website. It went live last week, and is full of information about the move, as well as audio video content, event listings and profiles of a wide variety of BBC staff members.”

We’ll be bringing you regular updates from MediaCity (Subscribe to RSS here) so if you have any news or views to share please feel free to mention it via the comments below or contact me on Twitter or email.

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/the-northerner/2011/may/31/mediacityuk-blog-tabner-bbc

Schools at the sharp end of knife crime education

Posted by MereNews On May - 31 - 2011 ADD COMMENTS

In a classroom at St Ignatius Roman Catholic primary school in Tottenham, London, Alvin Carpio sits amid a circle of children, 24 pairs of eyes intently focused on him as he talks about his own childhood, a few miles away in east London.

“Whoever stole the most, or had the biggest knife, was the biggest man there. And you wanted to be that guy,” he says. “We thought it was cool to steal – we really weren’t making the right choices.”

Choices are the theme of the day for this class of nine- and 10-year-olds. Carpio, social outreach co-ordinator of the church next to the school, has been invited in to lead a drama workshop about good and bad decisions. The class have been acting out little scenarios: pick up that purse and take the money, or take it to the police? Bully the new kid at school, or make him a friend? But they know there’s a darker theme underpinning the exercise. Carpio’s visit is part of a class project on knife crime, and the aim is to make them think about decisions they may one day have to make about whether to carry a weapon.

St Ignatius is among a growing number of primary schools that have decided to tackle the issue head-on – often prompted by their pupils. According to the Citizenship Foundation, under whose auspices this class are running their project, knife crime is one of the top three issues named by this age group as their most pressing concerns, along with the environment and health. And although the charity hasn’t yet assessed what proportion of schools taking up its “Make a Difference Challenge” – under which children choose a topic to tackle in their local communities – are looking at knives or other violent crime, it says a very significant proportion have done so.

It is certainly a topic in which this class is interested, not to say fascinated. They start off shy – “Why am I looking at three hands when I have 24 children in front of me?” exclaims the class teacher, Justa Fernandez. But within minutes there’s a sea of waving hands and voices crying: “Miss! Miss!” Everyone has an opinion. Some have suggestions about how to avoid getting involved: “Sometimes you just have to say ‘no’ to people,” Naysha, 10, suggests. Some want to share their experiences: Evita, 10, tells a story about how her brother was mugged three times for his mobile phone. “It was because he lived in N16,” she says. And some, particularly a few of the boys, just really want to share their knowledge on the subject. “People just want you in their gangs, so they don’t get in trouble – they stab people and run away,” says Jezreel, nine.

And that’s hardly surprising: these children could hardly be unaware of the effect of knife crime in their local community. On the front of the church next door to the school hangs a huge banner, which reads: “Isaiah 2:4: They will hammer their swords into ploughshares”. Underneath it is a knife amnesty bin into which people can place their weapons, dedicated to the memory of two young local men stabbed to death recently in separate incidents. One of them, a talented 17-year-old footballer named Godwin Lawson, who was killed last year, was a former pupil at St Ignatius, and some of Fernandez’s class knew his siblings.

Nationally, knife crime is on the wane – there were 210 murders involving knives or other sharp instruments in 2009-10, compared with 270 two years earlier. Yet there’s no denying it’s a real issue for the children at St Ignatius. The children chose the project themselves after drawing up a list of things they’d like to change about their area. The final choice came down to a vote between knife crime and pollution – and crime won hands down.

Over the last three months, they’ve been building the subject into their normal lessons. Work on persuasive writing produced a list of slogans, now pasted boldly on to the white board: “If you use a knife, you could delete a life”, “Drop that knife – don’t waste my time”. A surgeon has been in to talk about her experiences of treating knife-crime victims, and the local police have also been invited.

The subject has clearly caught the children’s imagination. Yet there’s no suggestion any of these pupils have been tempted to get involved in gangs or knife crime themselves. So why are they so seized by the issue?

Fernandez says it’s often on their minds: “It’s all around them; it’s on the news. They’ll often come in on a morning and say, ‘Did you see the news last night?’” she says. “Godwin Lawson went to school with one of our girls’ older brothers. She said in class that it made her sad when she heard his name mentioned.”

But while St Ignatius is in a high-crime, inner-city area, pupils from other districts are concerned, too. Marguerite Heath, director of Go Givers, the Citizenship Foundation’s main programme for primary schools, says it’s important to address their fears head-on.

“I think a lot of children do get quite concerned about this type of thing, particularly when they start to move on to secondary school,” she says. “When they start to travel around on their own, rather than going by car. And I think on the whole we try to protect them too much, actually. A lot of this is to do with peer pressure – children get pressured into belonging to gangs, and this kind of programme gives them opportunities to rehearse the skills and practice the values they need to overcome that.”

Leading campaigners on knife crime have argued that all children should learn how to make themselves safe – and should do so as early as possible. Earlier this year, Brooke Kinsella, the former EastEnders actress whose brother, Ben, was stabbed to death during a night out in north London in 2008, produced a report on the subject commissioned by the Home Office. It argued that all pupils should learn about knife crime during the last years of primary school, as the St Ignatius pupils have done this year.

But some sceptics say these efforts could prove counterproductive. Dennis Hayes, head of the Research Centre for Education and Career Development at the University of Derby, argues that there is a lack of solid evidence showing the effectiveness of such programmes.

“I think that unless they are thought through, initiatives with the best intentions can do a lot of damage,” he says. “For most kids, knife crime isn’t really an issue. Making them think about it is a bit like making people think about suicide. The message they get is that knife crime is a real problem, so perhaps they should carry a knife.”

Heath does not agree: “I think if you don’t address these issues that the children are thinking about, then misunderstanding grows and they can’t get on top of it,” she says. “The idea of the ‘Make a Difference Challenge’ is that they are finding a way they can actually do something about it, so they feel empowered, and once you feel on top of something, it’s no longer frightening.”

Some of the class have brought their own personal experiences in to share during the last two months. During our discussion, Olivia, 10, has been sitting with her hand up, but perhaps too shy to push herself forward. Eventually, Fernandez invites her to speak. “Not long ago,” she says, “someone stabbed someone near my house. And that made me think about knife crime. I felt that person’s family must be really sad about what happened.”

The bilingual support assistant, Maria Miele, prompts her: “Tell me what you told me when you came in that morning.”

“I thought maybe I would see them,” she says. “And maybe they could do something to someone I knew.”

The headteacher, Con Bonner, says it’s hardly surprising the children are frightened by such incidents when they happen so close to home: “It’s the environment where they’re living,” he says. “It’s a topic that’s discussed among young people generally. Literally in the streets they walk up and down, these events take place.”

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/may/31/knife-crime-primary-education

Environmental tax ‘threatens green science’

Posted by MereNews On May - 31 - 2011 ADD COMMENTS

World-class research into future sources of green energy is under threat in Britain from an environmental tax designed to boost energy efficiency and drive down carbon emissions, scientists claim.

Some facilities must find hundreds of thousands of pounds to settle green tax bills, putting jobs and research at risk.

The unexpected impact of the government’s carbon reduction commitment (CRC) scheme is so severe that scientists and research funders have lobbied ministers for an exemption to reduce the bills.

Among the worst hit is the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy in Oxfordshire, a facility for research into almost limitless carbon-free energy. The lab faces an estimated £400,000 payment next year, raising the spectre of job losses and operational cuts. “Considering our research is aimed at producing zero-carbon energy, it seems ironic and perverse to clobber us with an extra bill,” a senior scientist at the lab said. “We have to use electricity to run the machine and there is no way of getting around that.”

The laboratory operates the Joint European Torus (JET), the largest fusion reactor in Europe. It has led the way in research on fusion energy. The Culham lab faces a significant bill because, while energy savings can be made in other areas of the site, the machine incurs a large electricity bill when it is running.

The Prospect union is urging the government to exempt energy use where the focus of research contributes directly to public good and government policy.

“This [tax] will have a negative impact on important research into low carbon energy sources and that cannot be the right consequence of a policy the government is pursuing to promote a low carbon economy,” said Sue Ferns, head of research at Prospect. “There is a potential for the scheme to impact on employment and it adds to pressures to run the equipment less. Even if it doesn’t lead to substantial job losses, these are world-class scientists and every job, every piece of research makes a difference.”

Britain’s main funding body for research centres, the Science and Technology Facilities Council, is trying to persuade ministers to rethink how the scheme applies to scientific laboratories. The STFC’s bill will “inevitably” mean less funding for research across its centres, the Guardian has been told.

All representations have been dismissed by the government, but the chief scientist, Sir John Beddington, passed on researchers’ concerns to the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) for an ongoing review.

Across the UK, laboratories will be required to pay around £1m in annual CRC bills to the DECC. Almost all of that will be met by diverting grants from other areas of government, such as the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

In the October spending review, the government shelved plans to recycle money raised by the scheme to participants, and said it would instead earn £1bn in revenue to support public finances.

Another Oxfordshire laboratory, the Diamond synchrotron light source, expects a £300,000 bill under the CRC. A spokesman said the lab hoped to offset the bill by investing in better climate control and motion-sensitive lighting.

At the Daresbury laboratory in Cheshire, the CRC bill will worsen financial woes that have forced managers to draft redundancy packages and consider cutting back on equipment. “Science is already struggling here and now we are being charged an additional premium to go about our everyday business while working to address the government’s own stated grand challenges in science for the 21st century.,” said Lee Jones, an accelerator physicist at the laboratory.

The DECC said: “All parts of the UK economy will need to play a part in using energy more efficiently. The measures encouraged by the CRC can make organisations more competitive via the cost savings on their energy bills.

“We are working on simplifying the CRC scheme to make it more straightforward and reduce burden on participants. Further details of how we plan to do this will be published in the coming months.”

UN’s call to CO2 action

The fastest-ever rise in greenhouse gas emissions, revealed by the Guardian yesterday, is an “inconvenient truth” the world must face, the UN’s climate change chief said.

Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN framework convention, said: “This is the inconvenient truth of where human-generated greenhouse gas emissions are projected to go without much stronger international action, ” she said, issuing a call ahead of UN talks in Bonn next week. “I won’t hear that this is impossible.”

Estimates from the International Energy Agency show that last year saw a record CO2 rise, despite the recession and government policies aimed at curbing greenhouse gases. Most came from emerging economies, including China, but there is evidence the west “exported” billions of tonnes of emissions. Fiona Harvey

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/may/30/environmental-tax-threatens-green-energy-research

US abortion tactics on UK streets

Posted by MereNews On May - 31 - 2011 ADD COMMENTS

A sleepy sidestreet near the centre of Maidstone may seem an unlikely frontline in the conflict that has bubbled away, usually with relative calm, since Britain legalised abortion in 1967.

But on a recent weekday afternoon in Kent’s county town, a group of a dozen anti-abortion protesters, led by a veteran of the movement in the US, began their latest “prayer vigil” directly across the road from a Marie Stopes clinic.

Over the course of two hours, members of the group intercepted young women approaching the clinic from either end of the street to hand them literature and engage in conversation, while the protesters themselves became the target of shouts of “disgusting” and “shame” from angry passersby.

The protesters hail from the Helpers of God’s Precious Infants anti-abortion group and are led by Monsignor Philip Reilly, who has travelled from the US to meet British supporters.

Pro-choice groups say the Maidstone protest reflects an apparent ratcheting up of the activities of the more active elements in the anti-abortion movement, typically involving individuals with experience of the polarised world of America’s “culture wars”.

As well as Marie Stopes clinics around the UK, targets have included branches of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) and the sexual health charity Brook.

The surge in prayer vigil protests comes as abortion is edging back to the centre of mainstream political discourse.

A row erupted last week when the Guardian revealed an anti-abortion charity, Life, had effectively replaced the BPAS on a new sexual health advisory panel, while the MPs Nadine Dorries and Frank Field are spearheading a new drive in parliament to tighten the rules on terminations as part of the health and social care bill.

In Maidstone, police arrived to tell the group to remain on the other side of the street from the clinic. While two of the protesters engaged in an animated conversation with the officers, denying they were obstructing or harassing clients, a car with two women who had left the clinic accelerated at high speed and veered precariously close to the protest before driving on.

Reilly appeared unmoved by the suggestion he and his supporters were upsetting women already in the midst of a difficult personal experience.

“If you are upset because you are about to kill your child, because someone is outside praying, well thanks be to God that they are upset because maybe they will change their mind, keep their child and thank us later,” he told the Guardian.

Backing him are three bishops from the British Catholic hierarchy who have endorsed the vigils carried out by the Helpers of God’s Previous Infants, including Thomas McMahon, the bishop of Brentwood.

Darinka Aleksic, the campaign co-ordinator at Abortion Rights, the national pro-choice campaign, said: “We need to keep it in perspective because, in comparison with the US where there is a massive amount of harassment and threats to abortion providers, our situation is much better and we can be grateful.”

But she admitted there had been a recent rise in the number of American anti-abortion groups setting up UK branches: “There have always been pickets in the UK, particularly in Northern Ireland, but there has not been so much of it here.

“We don’t stage counter-protests because we don’t want to give them more publicity and/or turn the street into a battleground. But anything that makes it more distressing for women who have to walk past is very worrying.”

A previous lack of co-operation between different parts of the anti-abortion movement is changing, according to Andy Stephenson of Abort 67, which deploys shocking images to try to deter women from going through with terminations.

“A younger generation of anti-abortion leaders are emerging with more willingness to collaborate than has been seen before,” said Stephenson, who was arrested twice outside the Wistons abortion clinic in Brighton last September on suspicion of a public order offence for holding a large banner depicting an aborted foetus. The Crown Prosecution Service took no action and the activists involved, whose case was supported by the Christian Legal Centre, say they now have “very significant plans” for later in the year.

Other groups include the UK chapter of Bound4Life, which has imported from the US the tactic of “silent sieges” with activists standing outside abortion clinics with their mouths covered in red tape on which the word “life” is written.

Meanwhile, prayer vigils are held outside clinics by the 40 Days for Life campaign, which is affiliated to a US anti-abortion network and whose activities have been endorsed by the much older Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. Since the campaign started in the UK last September, 40-day vigils have been held outside a number of clinics and more are planned for later this year.

The group has been accused of filming women and clinic employees and handing out leaflets containing warnings about a supposed increase in breast cancer among women who have abortions. The protesters say they film their actions to protect themselves from attack.

The campaign’s director, Robert Colquhoun, said: “Many people perceive us to be fundamentalist, judgmental Christians but, through our prayer vigils, we have encountered many women who were going to go for abortions but who, having had the offer of help and alternatives from us, have decided not to go for abortion as a result of our peaceful, prayerful and legal presence there.”

Not surprisingly, such activites are viewed rather differently inside the clinics.

Inside Maidstone’s Marie Stopes centre, the manager, Julie Wilson, said: “The clinic has been here for 11 years and we have had protesters outside the building on a regular basis.

“Usually they are peaceful although, on occasions, they can be more intrusive and clients can be upset and decide not to go ahead with their appointment on the day. Generally though, we find these clients come back. It’s actually the people who accompany the clients who are often more upset.”

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/30/anti-abortion-protest-groups

Military on offensive in cyber war

Posted by MereNews On May - 31 - 2011 ADD COMMENTS

The UK is developing a cyber-weapons programme that will give ministers an attacking capability to help counter growing threats to national security from cyberspace, the Guardian has learned.

Whitehall officials have revealed that the UK needs to have a new range of offensive options, and not just bolster defences around the country’s critical services and government departments, which regularly come under attack from hackers.

The armed forces minister, Nick Harvey, told the Guardian that “action in cyberspace will form part of the future battlefield”, and though he said cyber-weapons would not replace traditional weapons, he admitted he now regards them as “an integral part of the country’s armoury”. It is the first official acknowledgment that such a programme exists.

Recognising that there is bound to be concern about when such weapons are used and who would sanction it, Harvey said they would be governed by the same rules that apply to the deployment of other military assets such as special forces.

“We need a toolbox of capabilities and that’s what we are currently developing,” he said. “The circumstances and manner in which we would use them are broadly analogous to what we would do in any other domain.”

He added: “Cyber is a new domain but the rules and norms, the logic and the standards that operate in any other domain … translate across into cyberspace.

“I don’t think that the existence of a new domain will, in itself, make us any more offensive than we are in any other domain. The legal conventions within which we operate are quite mature and well established.”

Though the nature of the weapons being developed remains top secret, it is understood that the Cabinet Office and the Cyber Security Operations Centre at GCHQ have taken the lead on the issue, and that in time there will be some input from the Ministry of Defence. The MoD recently appointed General Jonathan Shaw to head a defence cyber-operations group, and though he does not have an IT background, his experience as a battle-hardened commander from the Parachute Regiment will help refine what might be useful to the military. Shaw told the Guardian cyberspace represented “conflict without borders”.

The potential damage caused by highly sophisticated computer viruses was underlined last year with the discovery of the Stuxnet virus, which successfully disrupted Iran’s uranium enrichment programme. The Iranians have accused the Israelis and the US of designing and deploying Stuxnet, which set some of their centrifuges spinning out of control. Experts have described the virus as being so complex and technically advanced that is “beyond any threat we have seen in the past”. “Someone had the intent to weaponise a virus,” said Ilias Chantzos, a security expert.

Though Whitehall officials deny Britain had any involvement in the development of Stuxnet, its discovery added to the urgency of beefing up the country’s cyber-defences.

Last year’s national security strategy made cyber-security a tier one priority, and an extra £650m was found for it in the strategic defence and security review (SDSR). Harvey told the Guardian that digital networks were now “at the heart of our transport, power and communications systems”, and this reliance had “brought the capacity for warfare to cyberspace”.

“The consequences of a well planned, well executed attack against our digital infrastructure could be catastrophic … With nuclear or biological weapons, the technical threshold is high. With cyber the finger hovering over the button could be anyone from a state to a student.”

Though Harvey did not specify where future threats might come from, he warned that “it would be foolish to assume the west can always dictate the pace and direction of cyber-technology”.

He highlighted how China, for one, is developing “modern militaries and modern technologies”.

The foreign secretary, William Hague, told a security conference in Munich in February that the Foreign Office had repelled a cyber-attack a month earlier from “a hostile state intelligence agency”. Sources told the Guardian at the time that the attack was believed to be from Chinese intelligence agencies. In his Munich speech, Hague called for agreement on “acceptable rules” for how countries behave in cyberspace.

On Monday night General Graeme Lamb, a former director of UK special forces, told the Guardian that, if anything, the SDSR had not gone far enough in addressing the country’s potential vulnerabilities and should have been more radical.

He said that the national security council should have stopped the MoD from committing “its resources towards a more traditional defence posture”.

“The emerging threats we face are … breathtakingly complicated and far more sinister, far more deadly and far, far more likely [to be used]. Modern technology increasingly allows the individual to bring to bear industrial violence against our citizens previously the exclusive right of states … complacency has dulled our vision. This reality has for some time been creeping up on us.”

Professor Peter Sommer, an expert in technology and security affairs, said that it would not be difficult for GCHQ and other agencies to recast what they were doing to defend against cyber-attacks into a first-strike capability. “Any nation which carefully researches cyber-attack methods for defensive purposes has all the knowledge required for offensive activity. You can also easily argue that a well-targeted attack is low-cost, readily deniable and saves lives by disrupting the enemy. The interesting question then becomes, what are the rules for deployment?

“I suspect the UK will be borrowing from the doctrines which govern our special forces such as the SAS. It will all be covert but will stop at damaging civilians and assassinating heads of state. And the detailed rules will not be published.”

He also warned that the UK was in danger of having “too many overlapping and competing agencies and initiatives”.

Article source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/may/30/military-cyberwar-offensive

A recent wave of exploding watermelons has spotlighted safety fears in China's food sector.

Beijing (CNN) — Amid deepening public concerns over the country’s food safety following a wave of recent scandals, China’s highest court has ordered judges nationwide to hand down harsher sentences, including the death penalty, to people convicted of violating food safety regulations.

In a directive released by the state-run Xinhua news agency over the weekend, the Supreme People’s Court said in cases where people die from food safety violations, convicted suspects should be given the death sentence, while criminals involved in non-lethal cases should face longer prison terms and larger fines.

It also called for harsher punishment for government officials found protecting food safety violators or accepting bribes from them.

“The overall food safety situation is stable and improving, but incidents that still occur regularly have seriously endangered people’s lives and caused strong social reactions,” the directive quoted Wang Shengjun, the country’s top judge, as saying. “Our task to maintain food safety remains challenging.”

Food safety clubs in China

Chemicals spark watermelon explosions

From milk laced with melamine, pigs fed with performance-enhancing drugs to watermelons juiced up with growth-stimulating chemicals, a series of recent scandals have outraged Chinese consumers, despite ramped-up government crackdown and state media campaign against food safety violations.

From last September to April this year, Chinese courts have tried and convicted 106 people accused of violating food safety, including two who received life imprisonment last month in a “melamine milk” case, Xinhua reported.

“It’s clear that the credibility of the system will suffer,” said Peter K. Ben Embarek, the World Health Organization’s food safety official. “The (Chinese) consumer will continue to lose confidence in Chinese products and consumers abroad will equally lose confidence in Chinese products.”

The latest announcement by China’s supreme court, however, seems to run counter to another recent initiative to limit the use of the death penalty by the same court.

In its annual work report, the Supreme People’s Court last week instructed lower courts to suspend death sentences for two years if an immediate execution is not deemed necessary.

The Chinese legislature had earlier amended the country’s penal code to reduce the number of crimes punishable by death by 13 to 55.

China executes more people than all other countries combined, according to Amnesty International. It estimated the figure, considered a state secret, to be in the thousands last year for “a wide range of crimes that include non-violent offences.”

The number of executions elsewhere in the world in 2010 was at least 527, according to the London-based group’s annual report released earlier this year.

CNN’s Eunice Yoon contributed to this report.



Share this on:



FOLLOW THIS TOPIC

Article source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/edition_world/~3/tRFZVH1779Q/index.html

Contraction Continues for China Manufacturing

By AARON BACK BEIJING—A gauge of nationwide manufacturing activity was slightly higher in February but remained in contractionary territory, signaling [...]

Rural Population Stagnates

BY CONOR DOUGHERTY The nation’s rural regions saw much slower population growth over the past decade, reflecting a drop in [...]

EU Threatens to Cut Funding to Hungary

By RIVA FROYMOVICH And LAURENCE NORMAN BRUSSELS—The European Commission proposed Wednesday to suspend €495 million ($655 million) in European Union [...]

Europe Business Activity Shrinks

By ALEX BRITTAIN and ILONA BILLINGTON LONDON—Business activity in the euro zone contracted unexpectedly in February, reviving fears that the [...]

  • Polls

    • Do you use LED lighting at home:

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...
  • TAG CLOUD